229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 9.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
15.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 252.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-160.83%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 9571.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-160.83%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 9571.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
711.76%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 629.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
700.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 566.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
700.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 566.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-0.07%
Share reduction while SONY is at 9.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.07%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 9.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.07%
Dividend growth of 0.07% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
935.29%
OCF growth of 935.29% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
227.25%
FCF growth of 227.25% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
413.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 103.82%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
79.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 32.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
42.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 206.40% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
363.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 36.80% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.92%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-6.96%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.07%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.52%
BV/share growth of 6.52% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
3.12%
Debt growth of 3.12% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
1.07%
R&D growth of 1.07% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.87%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
