229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.97%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.30%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1834.39%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1834.39%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.27%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.27%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.91%
Dividend growth of 0.91% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
70.45%
OCF growth of 70.45% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
74.98%
FCF growth of 74.98% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
526.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 133.20%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
89.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 27.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
69.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 2.50%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
347.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 347.59% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
345.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 345.55% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
68.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 13.57%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
38.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.79%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.79% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
23.80%
AR growth of 23.80% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-9.11%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.51%
Asset growth of 3.51% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
4.97%
BV/share growth of 4.97% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-27.23%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.93%
R&D growth of 4.93% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
4.05%
SG&A growth of 4.05% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.
