229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.36%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 14.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.62%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-41.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-41.55%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-61.17%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-61.59%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-61.59%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.86%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 27.19%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.86%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 27.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
6.23%
Dividend growth of 6.23% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-98.68%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-105.57%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
562.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 212.71%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
103.56%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 32.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
54.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.96%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-98.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.77%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-45.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.83%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 14.81% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
3.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.60% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.13%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 13.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-9.23%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 8.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
9.34%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.03%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
81.48%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
8.33%
R&D growth of 8.33% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-6.99%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 145.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
