229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.90%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 15.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 28.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 123.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 123.67%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
41.10%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 107.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
41.51%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 108.17%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
41.51%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 108.17%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.46%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.46%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-7.09%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-533.33%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-250.00%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
493.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 117.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
91.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
46.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-110.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.91%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-22.59%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.10%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
31.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.82%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-3.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-4.90%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 19.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
38.92%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.02%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 2.43%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.73%
75-90% of SONY's 4.15%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-23.85%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.48%
R&D growth of 17.48% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
4.66%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
