229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.62%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-14.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-50.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-50.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-41.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-42.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-42.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.25%
Share change of 1.25% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.25%
Diluted share change of 1.25% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
5.82%
Dividend growth of 5.82% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-2488.46%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-759.52%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
626.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 110.35%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
115.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.40%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
64.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-768.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-3196.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.89%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-40.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 91.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
422.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 422.57% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
94.58%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
28.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 12.84% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.55%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.55% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
24.34%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
29.85%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.95%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.32%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
7.76%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.79%
R&D growth of 1.79% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-6.44%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
