229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.59%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 30.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-188.63%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 43.20%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-893.28%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 289.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-893.28%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 289.45%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-972.46%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 16.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-968.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-968.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.54%
Share change of 0.54% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-93.37%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-293.58%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-337.82%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
441.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 314.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
34.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 23.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
7.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1863.28%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-568.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-654.09%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-750.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 141.74%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-12.33%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.04%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-92.75%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-29.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 27.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.70%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 16.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-20.13%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 14.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-26.81%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 11.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
31.53%
Debt growth far above SONY's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-1.96%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-8.39%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 27.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
