229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.27%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 15.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
195.72%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 13.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
90.19%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 80.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
90.19%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 80.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
95.68%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 329.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
95.69%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 318.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
95.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 318.34%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.06%
Diluted share change of 0.06% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
179.28%
OCF growth of 179.28% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
173.32%
FCF growth of 173.32% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
400.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 180.39%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
39.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 30.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
9.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 31.04%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
306.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 306.58% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
196.60%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 196.60% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
84.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 47.61%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.54%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-5.42%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 24.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-27.63%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.12%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 4.85%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.81%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
73.44%
Debt growth far above SONY's 4.81%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
3.33%
R&D growth of 3.33% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-9.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
