229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.52%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.80%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of SONY's 42.37%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
61.21%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.21%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
178.13%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
178.26%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
178.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.66%
Share change of 0.66% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.66%
Diluted share change of 0.66% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.81%
OCF growth of 41.81% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
45.22%
FCF growth of 45.22% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
356.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 216.90%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
52.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 39.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
1.49%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 41.77%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
626.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 626.25% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
195.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 195.30% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.56%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
766.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 118.60%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
198.19%
Equity/share CAGR of 198.19% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.16%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.93%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
15.79%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-37.61%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.36%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 0.31%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.22%
50-75% of SONY's 1.98%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-0.09%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 29.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-5.81%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.37%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 1.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
