229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
10.31%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 4.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
221.21%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONY's 41.46%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
221.21%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONY's 41.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
121.46%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 190.52%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
121.57%
EPS growth at 75-90% of SONY's 141.96%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
119.61%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of SONY's 141.96%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
0.30%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 2.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
9.59%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 2.70%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.33%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-33.16%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 196.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-25.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 60.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-47.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 43.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.56% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-72.32%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is 141.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-76.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 671.56%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.41%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-53.87%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-12.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.55%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 6.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.53%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.36%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.96%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-9.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
