229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.53%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 11.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.39%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 12.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-66.93%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 22.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-66.93%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 22.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 13.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-12.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 12.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.39%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.81%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.66%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.63%
OCF growth of 20.63% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
14.68%
FCF growth of 14.68% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
14.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 156.77%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-35.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 65.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 39.27%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1480.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 1480.14% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
167.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 167.38% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
592.64%
Below 50% of SONY's 1652.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
116.54%
Below 50% of SONY's 380.94%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 27.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 63.84%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-11.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 12.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-28.00%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 8.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.47%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 6.08%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
12.19%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.87%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.10%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 7.50%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.34%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
