229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.83%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 7.80%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.96%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 12.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-92.86%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 58.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-92.86%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 58.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
50.37%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 141.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
43.18%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 139.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
48.57%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 136.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
5.63%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.83%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.29%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.60%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
7.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 135.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-40.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 78.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-38.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 29.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-73.66%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.37%
Below 50% of SONY's 534.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
644.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 170.53%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.15% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
26.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 40.03%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.44%
AR growth well above SONY's 7.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-61.11%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.70%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
29.27%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-68.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.26%
R&D growth of 5.26% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
1.67%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
