229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.37%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
58.07%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 14.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
113.16%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SONY's 216.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
113.16%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 216.88%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
64.86%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 218.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
60.32%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 220.96%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 208.25%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.63%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 13.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
OCF growth of 71.10% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
65.84%
FCF growth of 65.84% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
26.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 96.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-37.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 38.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 14.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
15.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 15.32% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-37.83%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
213.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 213.53% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
18.37%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 18.37% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is 280.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
222.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
133.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.84% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
30.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.74%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.98%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-25.00%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 9.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
46.99%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.76%
R&D growth of 9.76% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
35.74%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
