229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.99%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 9.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-9.56%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 10.78%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-71.19%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 64.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-71.19%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 64.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
27.32%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 150.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
26.73%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 144.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
23.91%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 147.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.70%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.65%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.85%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
12.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 122.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-44.54%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 68.02%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.90%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 8.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-84.28%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
668.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 668.87% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-56.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
38.15%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 60.93%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
141.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 114.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
117.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 20.81%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
112.38%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
17.45%
Below 50% of SONY's 65.17%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
162.86%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.38%
AR growth well above SONY's 0.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-33.33%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.18%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.22%
R&D growth of 2.22% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-10.03%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
