229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.17%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 18.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-1.09%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 28.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
68.57%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SONY's 136.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
68.57%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 136.13%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-14.16%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 103.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-14.06%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 101.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.16%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 100.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.60%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.61%
OCF growth of 283.61% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
555.88%
FCF growth of 555.88% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
2.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 99.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-46.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 66.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-40.46%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
782.27%
OCF/share CAGR of 782.27% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
188.42%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 188.42% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
28.19%
Below 50% of SONY's 102.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
47.20%
Below 50% of SONY's 268.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
399.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 12.72%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
112.81%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 22.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
11.94%
Below 50% of SONY's 64.74%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
171.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.52%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.87%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 18.83%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-50.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.07%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 4.59%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.43%
R&D growth of 5.43% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-3.14%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 7.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
