229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.47%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-14.00%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
22.03%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.03%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-15.45%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.15%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.59%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.08%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.48%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.05%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 60.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-52.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-9.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
19.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 19.75% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
117.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.91% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-37.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
27.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
116.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
160.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
110.20%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 35.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
8.02%
Below 50% of SONY's 114.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
167.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.96%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.45%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
560.00%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.86%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.23%
We have a declining book value while SONY shows 10.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.12%
R&D growth of 4.12% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
1.44%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
