229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-46.15%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-104.50%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 36.87%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-391.67%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 153.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-391.67%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 153.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-221.76%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 132.91%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-218.28%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 129.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-230.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 127.34%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
3.12%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 10.62%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-6.73%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 20.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.23%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-127.56%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-58.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 48.02%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-76.66%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 45.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-51.55%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-104.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-105.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-107.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-195.93%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-118.87%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is 48.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-434.37%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
67.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-3.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 77.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
126.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 22.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 4.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-36.36%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-12.01%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.35%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
3.67%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 12.95%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.99%
R&D growth of 0.99% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
5.32%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 8.63%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
