229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
42.11%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 7.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1933.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
96.90%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONY's 64.60%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
96.90%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONY's 64.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
120.77%
Net income growth above 1.5x SONY's 47.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
120.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x SONY's 46.15%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SONY's 51.59%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.64%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.64%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-238.46%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 363.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-74.29%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 83.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-37.17%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 47.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-53.20%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 19.55%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.32%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-70.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
91.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.31% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-121.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-76.99%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
104.15%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-40.37%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
44.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
29.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 56.34%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
105.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.44%
AR growth well above SONY's 3.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-52.38%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 12.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.41%
Asset growth at 50-75% of SONY's 4.38%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-1.89%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.93%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SONY's 7.58%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-0.98%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.68%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 9.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
