229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 23.93%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.73%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of SONY's 24.29%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
715.38%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONY's 278.25%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
715.38%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONY's 278.25%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
41.86%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 261.76%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
40.91%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 265.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 257.11%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.78%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.73%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 11.76%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-3.28%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 27.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-33.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 66.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-51.97%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 27.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-19.72%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
83.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 83.15% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-108.16%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-112.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
179.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 18.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
235.26%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 58.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-53.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
60.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 58.89%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
98.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 7.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.12%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 30.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
90.00%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 2.37%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.96%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 7.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.42%
Under 50% of SONY's 6.86%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.79%
R&D growth of 20.79% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-3.77%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
