229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.69%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.00%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.00%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
8.20%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.68%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
13.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.59%
Share change of 0.59% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-2.25%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
933.33%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 433.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
277.78%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 1699.88%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-32.46%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 85.71%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-55.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-28.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
248.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 248.42% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-52.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-34.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-42.95%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
87.45%
Below 50% of SONY's 610.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-52.09%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
55.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 61.63%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
83.71%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 7.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-42.11%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.82%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 2.66%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.01%
Under 50% of SONY's 3.23%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.92%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.63%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 12.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
