229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.17%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-35.23%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 124.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.23%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 124.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-42.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.15%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 0.38%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.91%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.38%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.73%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-94.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-48.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 63.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-54.22%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 13.66%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-38.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-90.45%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-67.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-85.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-84.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
123.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-80.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
43.32%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 37.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
44.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 53.38%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
58.81%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.65%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.87%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
109.09%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 17.95%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.68%
Similar asset growth to SONY's 1.61%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.03%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.63%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 10.82%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-2.59%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.84%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
