229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.41%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 27.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.40%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 74.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-29.31%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 1203.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-29.31%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 1203.77%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 581.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.00%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 583.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 546.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.82%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 8.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1950.00%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 544.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-65.85%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 639.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-43.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 78.74%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-41.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-25.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 6.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-110.75%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
87.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 87.25% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-133.99%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-83.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
143.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-87.26%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
31.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 40.07%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
141.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 44.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
10.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 19.56%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.80%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 18.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
30.77%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.46%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 2.88%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.47%
Under 50% of SONY's 7.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.61%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-4.50%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
0.74%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 35.48%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
