229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.98%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-2.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-73.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-73.17%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-240.63%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-237.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-237.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.65%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.23%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
321.62%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
126.47%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-44.88%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 83.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-36.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 9.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 10.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
162.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 162.41% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-70.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-67.09%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-131.13%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is at 78.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
85.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-135.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 67.93%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
26.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 36.47%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
142.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 36.87%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
15.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 19.63%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.74%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
32.35%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.08%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.06%
Under 50% of SONY's 2.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.38%
R&D growth of 10.38% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.94%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 1.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
