229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.01%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.56%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 4.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
54.55%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 391.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
54.55%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 391.49%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
86.67%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 1156.61%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
86.36%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 1117.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
86.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 1089.19%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 3.09%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 8.61%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.15%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
400.00%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-50.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 61.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-33.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.65%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-5.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-40.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-73.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-102.51%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is at 231.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-109.10%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is 37.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-102.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 178.25%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
21.68%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 31.80%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
135.88%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 33.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-16.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.22%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.46%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.41%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.27%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.42%
R&D growth of 3.42% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
6.79%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
