229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.20%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 3.22%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.96%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-11.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
333.33%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
333.33%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
333.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.89%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 930.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-35.56%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 451.35%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-50.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 17.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-23.14%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-31.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
224.11%
OCF/share CAGR of 224.11% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-53.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
44.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 44.55% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-91.56%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is at 897.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-81.36%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-94.59%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
21.08%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 8.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
118.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-11.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 21.71%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-6.82%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 4.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.47%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 3.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.16%
Under 50% of SONY's 2.03%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.13%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 2.28%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.65%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
0.33%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 0.72%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
