229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.75%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 27.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.39%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 40.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
53.33%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 292.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
53.33%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 292.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
35.71%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 182.56%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
28.57%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 182.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 177.03%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.08%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 0.26%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.42%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.84%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 7.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-165.52%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 12.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-46.80%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 80.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-18.71%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-23.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
101.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 101.85% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-97.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-96.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
106.47%
Below 50% of SONY's 299.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-86.12%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-91.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 18.63%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
33.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 43.01%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
108.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.22%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-9.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SONY is at 22.20%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.45%
AR growth well above SONY's 21.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-7.32%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.26%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 3.68%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.34%
Under 50% of SONY's 3.51%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.97%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.84%
R&D growth of 0.84% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-0.33%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 10.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
