229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.00%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.54%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
86.96%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
86.96%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
131.58%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
144.44%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
133.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.39%
Share change of 0.39% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.78%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
812.50%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 43.87%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
139.47%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 55.28%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-48.42%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 57.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-17.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-17.21%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY stands at 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
111.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 111.76% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-83.15%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-58.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
949.21%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-69.06%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-76.63%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
34.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 39.25%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
91.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-7.18%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.86%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
47.37%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.81%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.21%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-7.50%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.02%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 6.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
