229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.97%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.54%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 6.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
72.09%
EBIT growth 75-90% of SONY's 93.07%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
72.09%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of SONY's 93.07%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
43.18%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 100.99%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
40.91%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 101.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
42.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 101.01%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.56%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1066.67%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-47.56%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 51.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-12.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
85.31%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.21%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-61.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-26.70%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
1667.12%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1.65%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-69.06%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
128.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
36.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with SONY's 33.20%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
68.07%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.38%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
8.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to SONY's 8.48%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.50%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 2.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
58.93%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 15.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.29%
Asset growth at 75-90% of SONY's 2.83%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
2.46%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 1.81%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.66%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 12.56%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.21%
R&D growth of 7.21% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.24%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
