229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.84%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 12.78%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-1.12%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 42.39%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.35%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 521.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.35%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 521.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-26.98%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 2972.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-29.03%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 2873.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 2687.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.80%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.59%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 8.13%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.15%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 396.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-85.14%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 162.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-40.15%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 49.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-6.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
26.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.22%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
333.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 333.64% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-83.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
231.33%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 195.63%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
76.19%
Below 50% of SONY's 1027.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-74.56%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1.34%
Below 50% of SONY's 64.66%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
38.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 31.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
54.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 2.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
13.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 7.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.17%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.21%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 11.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.39%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.87%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while SONY stands at 13.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.36%
R&D growth of 3.36% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
0.58%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 35.92%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
