229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.50%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 28.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.47%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 30.98%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-4.00%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 377.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.00%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 377.32%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
32.61%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 180.42%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
31.82%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 182.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
27.27%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 178.92%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.65%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.19%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.80%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.90%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.22%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
565.38%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 43.53%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-40.62%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 92.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-0.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONY stands at 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
26.98%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 9.50%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-5.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
84.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 84.20% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
694.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 204.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-71.98%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONY is at 373.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-76.92%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-7.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SONY is 27.61%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
35.86%
Equity/share CAGR of 35.86% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
24.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 16.93%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
15.99%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.04%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 26.73%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
14.29%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.25%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 5.23%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.56%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
R&D growth of 1.63% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 10.15%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
