229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.68%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.42%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
77.78%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
77.78%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
73.77%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
68.97%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
67.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.27%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.35%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.95%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.44%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
121.97%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.93%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY stands at 57.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
48.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14.70%
OCF/share CAGR of 14.70% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
66.28%
OCF/share CAGR of 66.28% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
47.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-42.06%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-21.86%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
46.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 54.98%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
33.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.49%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
40.28%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.45%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.14%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 2.31%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.40%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.06%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 3.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
