229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.31%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
51.11%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
79.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONY's 45.06%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
79.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONY's 45.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
31.40%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 101.60%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
29.95%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 101.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
30.51%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 101.48%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 7.64%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.74%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 7.64%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-69.36%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
8.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 32.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
363.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
237.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-10.38%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
1867.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
122.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
584.91%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
321.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
8239.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
77.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 123.17%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
83.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
75.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 15.64%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.72%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
47.88%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 12.10%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
23.14%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.53%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
11.55%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.81%
R&D growth of 23.81% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
34.47%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
