229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.18%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.07%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 12.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.73%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 255.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.73%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 255.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.43%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 3122.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-28.40%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 3087.64%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-27.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 2959.55%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.22%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.50%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 4.83%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.17%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 154.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-258.21%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 64.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
17.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.41%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
150.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
153.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
79.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.69% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-133.84%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-209.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
132.59%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 147.49%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
684.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2410.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
148.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 105.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
79.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.06%
AR growth well above SONY's 6.96%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-16.39%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.90%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 5.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.36%
50-75% of SONY's 3.26%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.30%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-6.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
