229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.25%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 38.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 51.12%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-18.21%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 206.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.21%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 206.91%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
15.12%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 491.50%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.79%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 499.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.97%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 494.23%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.24%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.12%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.25%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
905.60%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 242.35%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
342.14%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 203.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
16.59%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 32.07%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
142.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.33%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
139.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
103.98%
OCF/share CAGR of 103.98% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
2600.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 90.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
10568.58%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
957.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 240.84% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
533.95%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 115.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2005.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.78%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
168.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 113.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
98.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 34.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
88.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.74%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.54%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 33.19%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
4.41%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
8.65%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 6.23%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.14%
50-75% of SONY's 9.71%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.35%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 35.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
