229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.69%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.57%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
14.83%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
14.65%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.30%
Share change of 0.30% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.32%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 66.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
18.18%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 88.11%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
21.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
174.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
139.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
51.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 51.22% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
215.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1125.90%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1164.79%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
574.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
944.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.36%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
183.02%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 103.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
109.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
100.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 29.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.86%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
26.76%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 6.96%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.83%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.69%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.29%
R&D growth of 2.29% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
7.02%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
