229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.02%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 6.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.71%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.27%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.27%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-23.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.68%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-23.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.62%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.51%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 125.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-66.07%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 55.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
91.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.63%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
188.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
133.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
292.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 292.05% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
29964.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
918.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
144.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1476.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1317.28%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
474.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 93.21%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 34.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
131.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 30.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 11.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.35%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 22.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.85%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 6.34%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
8.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.76%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
