229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.82%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-25.75%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-38.15%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-38.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-33.90%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 19.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.26%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 19.66%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 19.80%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.42%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.08%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.19%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 126.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-61.72%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 48.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
220.89%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
317.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
112.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 13.68%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
361.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 361.94% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
897.88%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
104.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1040.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
6018.61%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
231.10%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
680.61%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 68.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
257.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 36.23%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
159.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 28.27%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.14%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 13.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-20.70%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 5.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.44%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONY's 4.81%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.98%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.98%
R&D growth of 10.98% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-7.71%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 32.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
