229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.64%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 34.78%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
5.09%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 17.65%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
5.86%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 124.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.86%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 124.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
2.58%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 183.79%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.12%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 183.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.17%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 183.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 1490.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
1.33%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 395.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
220.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 6.03%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
294.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 12.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
95.57%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 20.83%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
286.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 286.23% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
13382.72%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 49.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
158.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 63.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
539.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 3.62% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
4506.87%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
209.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
695.31%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 57.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
281.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 35.40%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
165.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 27.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.36%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 19.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.73%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.06%
Similar asset growth to SONY's 4.07%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
8.18%
75-90% of SONY's 10.75%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.96%
R&D growth of 6.96% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
3.39%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
