229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.77%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.35%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 41.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.59%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 752.87%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 752.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
5.97%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
5.54%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
5.66%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.38%
Share change of 0.38% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.26%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 6.21%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
290.82%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
208.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
275.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 12.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
98.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
709.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 709.32% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
4704.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
428.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 26.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
552.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2008.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 114.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
144.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 128.88%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
726.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 44.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
331.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.66%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
177.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.31%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.96%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.61%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
14.07%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.20%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.05%
R&D growth of 2.05% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.06%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
