229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.78%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
28.95%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
47.43%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
47.43%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
41.29%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 101.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
41.14%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 101.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
41.96%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 91.93%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.44%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 4.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.31%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-7.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
261.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 1.49%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
313.21%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 13.79%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
65.24%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.16%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
974.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 974.64% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1366.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1200.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
542.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1977.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 2886.76%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
165.43%
Below 50% of SONY's 3820.50%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
624.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 51.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
331.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 42.12%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
155.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 22.57%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.44%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 10.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-22.20%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 18.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
18.29%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.51%
50-75% of SONY's 3.40%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.70%
R&D growth of 5.70% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.21%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 27.81%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
