229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.71%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.88%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.59%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.59%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-24.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.17%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.64%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 133.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-79.78%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 84.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
226.57%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
250.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.23%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
76.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 19.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
91.36%
OCF/share CAGR of 91.36% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1030.41%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
734.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 51.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
446.35%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2047.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
177.32%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
584.16%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 41.33%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
343.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
164.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 12.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.05%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-21.21%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 12.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.05%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 0.84%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.88%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.27%
R&D growth of 1.27% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-9.72%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
