229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.13%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONY's 4.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.75%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 6.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 239.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.30%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 239.52%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.99%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.66%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.28%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.68%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.92%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 47.15%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
175.59%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONY's 67.27%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
245.01%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
247.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
81.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1563.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 1563.14% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
802.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
114.74%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
290.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1590.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
148.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
461.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 46.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
351.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 25.52%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
164.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.68%
AR growth well above SONY's 7.58%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
21.79%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.34%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.19%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.90%
R&D growth of 6.90% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.54%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
