229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.39%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
19.55%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.16%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.16%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
35.48%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.83%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
34.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Share change of 0.48% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.57%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.00%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 307.05%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
32.03%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 1971.08%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
416.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
258.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
94.04%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
897.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 897.10% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
499.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 64.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
180.32%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 59.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
948.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1241.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
192.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
612.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 32.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
432.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 14.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
201.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.98%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
19.74%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
21.63%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.99%
R&D growth of 4.99% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
5.25%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
