229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.90%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 4.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
77.39%
Gross profit growth similar to SONY's 73.62%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
115.46%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 249.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
115.46%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 249.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
102.88%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
96.37%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.61%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.59%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.88%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
104.70%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
377.20%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
292.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
109.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1004.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 1004.93% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
551.40%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 331.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
202.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 158.20%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
1215.98%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
899.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
219.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
477.70%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 31.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
439.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 12.41%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
202.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
26.59%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 2.59%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.53%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.94%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
12.36%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.87%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
R&D growth of 11.17% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
21.17%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
