229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.93%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-12.26%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-15.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-9.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 26.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.69%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 26.16%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 26.16%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.44%
Slight or no buybacks while SONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.34%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 208.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.43%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 305.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
396.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
270.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
143.85%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2630.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 2630.18% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
287.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 21.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
201.86%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 607.64%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
843.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
843.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
279.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
567.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 36.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
448.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 5.49%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
205.17%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.76%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 4.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.87%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.52%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
R&D growth of 7.04% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-5.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
