229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.57%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
22.43%
Positive gross profit growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
28.65%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 19.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
28.65%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 19.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
32.43%
Positive net income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.77%
Positive EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.77%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.26%
Share change of 0.26% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Similar OCF growth to SONY's 19.59%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
16.65%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 41.11%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
677.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
396.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
211.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2471.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 2471.80% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
578.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 10.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
219.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1711.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 16.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
799.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 30.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
353.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 48.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
732.03%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 15.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
477.90%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
213.16%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
11.57%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 1.20%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
16.16%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.35%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.57%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.47%
R&D growth of 6.47% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.25%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
