229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.45%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
37.09%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONY's 4.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
43.69%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
43.69%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.37%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 184.74%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
35.29%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 184.72%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
35.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 184.60%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.47%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.97%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
74.74%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1847.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
320.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
165.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
55245.37%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 77.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3020.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 92.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
234.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 92.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2227.62%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 137.33% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
860.34%
Below 50% of SONY's 3841.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
261.82%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
980.27%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 23.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
489.53%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
209.95%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.35%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-15.79%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 15.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
15.37%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.80%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.40%
R&D growth of 16.40% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
20.69%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
