229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.76%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.78%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
0.60%
Positive EBIT growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.60%
Positive operating income growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.28%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.42%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.30%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.37%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 1847.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-34.63%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 177.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1192.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
415.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.64%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
212.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
10696.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 52.56%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
4631.75%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 145.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
396.64%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to SONY's 374.59%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
10338.87%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 91.95% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1230.09%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 45.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
445.83%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1133.06%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 24.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
544.98%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
224.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.03%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.08%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 22.54%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
9.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.11%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
11.98%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.43%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.04%
R&D growth of 1.04% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-7.01%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
