229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.83%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SONY's 27.30%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
16.68%
Gross profit growth similar to SONY's 17.89%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
19.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 100.32%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
19.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 100.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
22.06%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 72.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
21.74%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 72.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
21.74%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 72.28%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.32%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.61%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONY's 143.22%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
82.38%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 251.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1358.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
501.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
265.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
25452.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 232.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
914.06%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 74.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
702.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
8923.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1323.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
550.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1253.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 18.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
583.25%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
237.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONY's 28.75%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-4.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.59%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
12.44%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONY's 1.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.09%
R&D growth of 8.09% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
8.62%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 10.91%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
