229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.55%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-7.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-9.37%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.23%
Share change of 0.23% while SONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.18%
Slight or no buyback while SONY is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.11%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-42.26%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1373.65%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
437.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
242.19%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2766.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
809.38%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
132.05%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7484.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1024.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
457.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1377.29%
Positive growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
605.94%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
228.37%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.20%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-12.71%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
9.00%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.23%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.71%
R&D growth of 2.71% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
5.74%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
