229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.89%
Positive revenue growth while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
81.92%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 364.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
99.08%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 373.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
99.08%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 373.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
97.25%
Net income growth comparable to SONY's 98.84%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
100.00%
EPS growth similar to SONY's 98.84%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
100.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SONY's 98.84%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.32%
Positive OCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
175.26%
Positive FCF growth while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2443.10%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
499.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
335.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
31443.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 80.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 59.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
325.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 81.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
25845.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 88.87% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1098.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
677.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1613.67%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 0.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
638.86%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SONY is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
275.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.02%
Our AR growth while SONY is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
59.28%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 14.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.17%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
17.19%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.52%
R&D growth of 17.52% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
28.64%
We expand SG&A while SONY cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
